True crime news logo
  • Krimidex

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest stories

Never miss the latest true crime news, reviews and top lists — plus new podcasts, series, films and books.

You can unsubscribe with one click from any email.

True crime news logo

The international true crime destination. Cases, documentaries, podcasts and travel routes.

© 2026 truecrime.news. All rights reserved.

Krimidex/retrial
Procedural term

retrial

A new trial ordered in the same criminal case after the first trial ended without a final verdict or after a conviction was overturned on appeal. Not permitted after an acquittal due to double jeopardy protections.

retrial — Krimidex illustration

Definition

A retrial is a second trial in the same criminal case, typically ordered when the first trial ended inconclusively or when a conviction has been reversed on appeal. In the U.S. federal system, retrials most commonly occur after a mistrial is declared—for example, when a jury cannot reach a unanimous verdict (a hung jury)—or when an appellate court overturns a conviction due to legal errors that occurred during the original trial.

The right to order a retrial is not unlimited. The Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits the government from prosecuting a defendant twice for the same offense after an acquittal. This means that if a defendant is found not guilty, no retrial is permitted regardless of new evidence or procedural errors. However, if a trial ends in a mistrial, hung jury, or if a conviction is reversed on appeal for reasons other than insufficient evidence, the prosecution may generally retry the defendant without violating double jeopardy protections.

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure govern the retrial process. Rule 31(c)(3) specifically addresses situations where a jury cannot agree on a verdict, allowing the court to declare a mistrial and permitting the government to retry the defendant on the counts where no verdict was reached. When an appellate court reverses a conviction, it will typically specify whether the case should be remanded for retrial or dismissed entirely, depending on the nature of the error.

In true crime contexts, retrials often generate significant public attention, particularly in high-profile cases where new evidence has emerged or where the original trial was marked by controversy. Retrials can occur months or even years after the original proceedings, during which witnesses' memories may have faded and evidence may have become more difficult to present. The decision to pursue a retrial involves prosecutorial discretion, weighing factors such as the strength of the evidence, the interests of justice, and the resources required to conduct a new trial.

Defense attorneys may seek retrials through post-conviction motions or appeals, arguing that errors in the original trial prejudiced their client's right to a fair proceeding. Common grounds for granting retrials include jury misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, or the discovery of significant new evidence that could not have been presented at the original trial. However, courts apply strict standards before ordering retrials, as the judicial system has an interest in finality and in avoiding unnecessary repetition of proceedings.

Related entries

retrial

Related articles

Podcast: Murdoch-retrial og sociale mediers magt over retfærdighed

Podcast: Murdoch Retrial and Social Media's Hold on Justice

In the May 14, 2026 episode of True Crime Time, host Woody Overton examines how social media and popular culture are increasingly influencing the outcomes of high-profile criminal cases — including the controversial Murdoch retrial and a recent wedding murder.

Facts

Type
Procedural term
Legal reference
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 31(c)(3); Fifth Amendment (Double Jeopardy Clause)
Last updated
22 May 2026