True crime news logo
  • Krimidex

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest stories

Never miss the latest true crime news, reviews and top lists — plus new podcasts, series, films and books.

You can unsubscribe with one click from any email.

True crime news logo

The international true crime destination. Cases, documentaries, podcasts and travel routes.

© 2026 truecrime.news. All rights reserved.

Sagsmappe

How Cambridge Analytica Harvested 87 Million Facebook Users

The 2018 data scandal that reshaped global tech regulation—and why it matters beyond Silicon Valley

A figure resembling Christopher Wylie, in a casual jacket, stands in an office surrounded by computer screens displaying data visualizations, symbolizing the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal.
BEVIS

Klassifikation:

Corruption
Conspiracy theory
Manipulation
Wisconsin
Michigan
USA
United Kingdom
Scandal

Quick Facts

Gerningsmand(e)Cambridge Analytica, Aleksandr Kogan
Offer(e)87 millioner Facebook-brugere
GerningsstedFacebook-platformen
Gerningsdato2013-2015
ForbrydelsestypeUautoriseret dataindsamling
Fraud
Politics
Media
Internet
Identity theft
False report
Psychology
justitssvigt
justitsmordet
hvidvaskning
cybersikkerhed
magtmisbrug
overerstatningskommission
forbud
domstol

In the spring of 2018, one of the largest data breaches in internet history became public—not through an anonymous leak, but through a whistleblower willing to testify and journalists willing to investigate. The story that emerged from *The Guardian* and *New York Times* on March 17, 2018, exposed a systematic surveillance operation that had compromised the personal information of roughly one in three American Facebook users.

The operation itself was deceptively simple. Between 2013 and 2015, Cambridge Analytica, a British-headquartered political consulting firm, deployed a psychological survey app called "thisisyourdigitallife." Created by researcher Aleksandr Kogan, the app was straightforward: users installed it, answered questions, and received feedback on their personality.

But the real data collection operated on a different level. When someone installed the app, it didn't just gather their responses—it gained access to data from all of their Facebook friends as well. The app was installed by approximately 300,000 people, but through Facebook's permissive API (Application Programming Interface) design at the time, Cambridge Analytica captured information from roughly 87 million users who had never even interacted with the app.

Timeline

1 January 2013

Start der Datensammlung

Cambridge Analytica beginnt über die App "thisisyourdigitallife" systematisch Daten von Facebook-Nutzern zu sammeln. Etwa 300.000 Nutzer installieren die App, die jedoch auch auf Freundeslisten zugreift.

31 December 2015

Ende der aktiven Datensammlung

Nach etwa drei Jahren endet die systematische Datensammlung. Insgesamt wurden Daten von 87 Millionen Facebook-Profilen ohne Zustimmung gesammelt.

8 November 2016

Einsatz bei US-Präsidentschaftswahl

Cambridge Analytica nutzt die gesammelten Daten zur Unterstützung der Trump-Kampagne bei der US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2016.

17 March 2018

Öffentliche Enthüllung

The Guardian und New York Times veröffentlichen gleichzeitig Artikel über den Datenskandal. Whistleblower Christopher Wylie, ehemaliger Mitarbeiter von Cambridge Analytica, deckt das Ausmaß auf.

18 March 2018

Facebook sperrt Cambridge Analytica

Einen Tag nach der Veröffentlichung suspendiert Facebook Cambridge Analytica und die verbundene SCL Group von seiner Plattform.

2 May 2018

Cambridge Analytica meldet Insolvenz

Nur zwei Monate nach der Enthüllung beantragt Cambridge Analytica Insolvenz nach Chapter 7 und stellt alle Operationen ein.

24 July 2019

5-Milliarden-Dollar-Strafe für Facebook

Die US-Handelsbehörde FTC verhängt eine Rekordstrafe von 5 Milliarden US-Dollar gegen Facebook wegen Verletzung der Privatsphäre von Nutzern.

30 October 2019

Strafe in Großbritannien

Das britische Information Commissioner's Office verhängt die Höchststrafe von 500.000 Pfund gegen Facebook.

**The Technical Vulnerability**

This breach reveals a critical flaw in how Facebook operated during the early-to-mid 2010s. The platform allowed third-party applications sweeping access to user data—a design choice that prioritized developer innovation over user privacy. Facebook's API permitted apps to retrieve not just a user's direct information, but data from their entire social network, with minimal oversight.

Cambridge Analytica weaponized this vulnerability. The harvested data—demographic information, behavioral patterns, political leanings, and psychological profiles—was compiled into detailed voter profiles. The firm used this intelligence to assist political campaigns, notably the 2016 presidential campaigns of Ted Cruz and Donald Trump, crafting targeted messaging designed to influence voting behavior.

For nearly three years, the operation remained hidden. Then, in March 2018, Christopher Wylie, a former Cambridge Analytica employee turned whistleblower, provided journalists and regulators with evidence of the scheme.

**Swift Corporate Collapse**

The consequences were swift and severe. Facebook suspended Cambridge Analytica from its platform within 24 hours of the public revelation. Within two months, Cambridge Analytica filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection—the legal mechanism that results in complete liquidation rather than restructuring. The firm ceased operations entirely by May 2018.

Facebook itself faced historic regulatory penalties. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission imposed a $5 billion fine in July 2019—at that time, the largest privacy penalty ever assessed against a technology company. The United Kingdom's Information Commissioner's Office fined Facebook £500,000 in October 2019.

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's CEO, was called to testify before the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee. The company announced it would notify affected users starting April 9, 2018, and pledged new privacy protections.

**Global Ripple Effects**

The Cambridge Analytica scandal became a watershed moment in technology regulation. It demonstrated that social media platforms could serve as infrastructure for political manipulation at scale, and that self-regulation by tech companies was insufficient.