udleveringssag
A legal proceeding to transfer a person accused or convicted of a crime from one U.S. state to another for prosecution or punishment. Governed by the Interstate Extradition Clause of the U.S. Constitution and federal statute.
An udleveringssag, or interstate extradition case, is a formal legal process through which one U.S. state requests the surrender of an individual located in another state who is accused of committing a crime or has been convicted and fled to avoid punishment. This mechanism ensures that crossing state lines does not provide refuge from criminal justice.
The process is rooted in Article IV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes the duty of states to deliver up fugitives from justice. The federal statutory framework is codified in 18 U.S.C. § 3182, which specifies the procedural requirements for interstate extradition. When a person is charged with a crime in one state (the demanding state) and is found in another state (the asylum state), the demanding state must present a formal requisition supported by an indictment, information, or affidavit made before a magistrate charging the individual with having committed a crime.
The governor of the demanding state typically issues a formal extradition request to the governor of the asylum state. Upon receiving proper documentation, the asylum state is constitutionally obligated to arrest and surrender the fugitive to authorized agents of the demanding state. The asylum state generally cannot inquire into the guilt or innocence of the accused, but may verify the authenticity of the extradition documents and confirm the identity of the person sought.
In true crime contexts, extradition cases often arise when suspects flee across state lines after committing violent crimes, financial fraud, or other serious offenses. High-profile cases frequently involve legal challenges where defendants contest their extradition on procedural grounds, though such challenges rarely succeed given the strong constitutional mandate for interstate cooperation in criminal matters. The process differs from international extradition, which involves treaties between sovereign nations and presents more complex legal questions regarding jurisdiction and human rights protections.