True crime news logo
  • Krimidex

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest stories

Never miss the latest true crime news, reviews and top lists — plus new podcasts, series, films and books.

You can unsubscribe with one click from any email.

True crime news logo

The international true crime destination. Cases, documentaries, podcasts and travel routes.

© 2026 truecrime.news. All rights reserved.

Sagsmappe

The Central Park Five: Wrongful Conviction and DNA Justice

How five teenagers were imprisoned for a crime they didn't commit—and what their exoneration revealed about the justice system

Central Park Five: Da fem uskyldige drenge blev ofre for racisme
BEVIS

Sagsdetaljer

Quick Facts

Klassifikation:

Sager der forandrede verden
Sagsstatus
Løst
Sted
Central Park, New York City, USA
Opfer
Trisha Meili, 28 Jahre, Investmentbankerin
Unschuldige Verurteilte
Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Korey Wise (14-16 Jahre)
Datum
19. April 1989, Central Park, New York City
Gesamthaftzeit
Über 40 Jahre (alle fünf zusammengerechnet)
Entlastung
2002 durch DNA-Beweise und Geständnis des wahren Täters
Echter Täter
Matias Reyes, verurteilter Serienvergewaltiger
Entschädigung
41 Millionen US-Dollar Vergleich mit New York City (2014)
Gesetzesreform
New York State verbot Lügen über Beweise bei Verhören Minderjähriger

Retfærdighed og systemfejl

On April 19, 1989, Trisha Meili, a 28-year-old white investment banker, was jogging in Central Park when she was beaten, raped, and left for dead. The crime occurred during a surge in violent attacks that night, with dozens of teenagers reported to be harassing and assaulting people throughout the park.

Five teenagers were arrested shortly after: Antron McCray (15), Kevin Richardson (14), Yusef Salaam (15), Raymond Santana (14), and Korey Wise (16). All were part of a larger group of up to 33 youths present in the park that evening. A sixth teenager, Steven Lopez, was also indicted but his charges were later dropped after he pleaded guilty to assaulting another jogger, John Loughlin.

Confessions and Inconsistencies

Timeline

19 April 1989

Vergewaltigung im Central Park

Die 28-jährige Joggerin Trisha Meili wird im Central Park brutal überfallen und vergewaltigt. Sie überlebt nur knapp.

20 April 1989

Verhaftung der fünf Teenager

Die Polizei verhaftet fünf Jugendliche im Alter von 14 bis 16 Jahren: Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana und Korey Wise.

21 April 1989

Erzwungene Geständnisse

Nach stundenlangen Verhören ohne Anwälte gestehen alle fünf unter Druck und falschen Versprechungen. Die Geständnisse widersprechen sich gegenseitig und den Fakten.

18 August 1990

Verurteilung

Alle fünf werden verurteilt – trotz fehlender DNA-Übereinstimmung und widersprüchlicher Aussagen. Sie erhalten Strafen zwischen 5 und 15 Jahren.

6 January 2002

Geständnis des wahren Täters

Der verurteilte Serienvergewaltiger Matias Reyes gesteht die Tat. Seine DNA stimmt mit den Spuren vom Tatort überein.

19 December 2002

Urteile aufgehoben

Ein Gericht in Manhattan hebt alle Verurteilungen auf. Die Central Park Five sind offiziell entlastet.

27 June 2014

Vergleich über 41 Millionen Dollar

New York City zahlt den fünf Männern 41 Millionen US-Dollar Entschädigung – nach jahrelangem Rechtsstreit.

31 May 2019

Netflix-Serie 'When They See Us'

Die von Ava DuVernay produzierte Miniserie erreicht weltweite Aufmerksamkeit und gewinnt mehrere Emmys.

During interrogations lasting 14 to 30 hours, four of the five confessed to the attack. However, these confessions soon proved deeply problematic. The youths later recanted, alleging coercion during questioning. More critically, their accounts were inconsistent with each other and contradicted the physical evidence gathered at the crime scene.

Despite confessions, no physical evidence linked any of the five to Meili's attack. No blood was found on their clothing, and crucially, DNA evidence from semen recovered from the victim did not match any of the accused teenagers. There was also no physical evidence suggesting multiple attackers, yet all five were being prosecuted as co-perpetrators.

Trial, Conviction, and Prison

The case proceeded to , and after jury deliberations lasting ten days, verdicts were returned on August 18, 1990. All five were convicted of assault and rape in connection with Meili's attack, as well as assault and related to the separate attack on John Loughlin. Three of the five were acquitted of attempted charges. Despite the questionable , sentences ranged from 7 to 13 years in prison.

Advertisement
SS

Susanne Sperling

Se alle artikler →
Del dette opslag:
trial
robbery
murder
evidence

The Real Perpetrator Emerges

The breakthrough came in 2002, thirteen years after conviction. Serial rapist Matias Reyes confessed to attacking Meili alone—he was the sole perpetrator. DNA testing matched semen from the victim to Reyes, definitively proving he was responsible for the rape and assault.

Reyes had also attacked another woman in Central Park just two days earlier, on April 17, 1989. Though he was identified at that time by distinctive chin stitches, authorities failed to connect him to Meili's case. He later confessed to additional violent crimes, including the rape and murder of a pregnant woman in August 1989.

With Reyes's confession and DNA confirmation, all five teenagers were fully exonerated. Their convictions were vacated.

Aftermath and Systemic Reform

The case exposed profound failures in investigation, interrogation tactics, and evidence handling. Media coverage had fueled public presumption of guilt, with outlets labeling the youths a "wilding" gang despite significant evidence gaps.

In 2014, the five men—by then known as the Exonerated Five—settled a wrongful conviction lawsuit against New York City for $41 million, one of the largest settlements of its kind.

The Central Park Five case became a watershed moment in American criminal justice discourse, prompting critical examination of how confessions are obtained from minors, the dangers of tunnel vision in investigations, and the necessity of rigorous DNA analysis. The case continues to serve as a stark reminder of how systemic failures and bias can destroy innocent lives.