True crime news logo
  • Krimidex

Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest stories

Never miss the latest true crime news, reviews and top lists — plus new podcasts, series, films and books.

You can unsubscribe with one click from any email.

True crime news logo

The international true crime destination. Cases, documentaries, podcasts and travel routes.

© 2026 truecrime.news. All rights reserved.

Sagsmappe

Dutch Regulator Fines Uber €290M for Illegal Data Transfers

The ride-sharing giant systematically moved driver data to the U.S. without required safeguards for over two years

A figure resembling Joe Sullivan sits at a wooden desk, an open laptop in front of him displaying a swirling Bitcoin transaction graphic, symbolizing the controversial payment to hackers during the 2016 Uber data breach cover-up.
BEVIS

Sagsdetaljer

Quick Facts

Klassifikation:

Data breach
High-profile case
Bribery
Scandal
California
Texas
USA
Internet
Extortion
Corruption
Leadership
Identity theft
Trial
Cybercrime
Surveillance
cybersikkerhed
Sagsstatus
Løst
Sted
San Francisco, California, USA

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (DPA) fined Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber B.V. a combined €290 million on August 26, 2024, for violations of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The enforcement action centers on Uber's systematic transfer of sensitive personal data belonging to European Economic Area (EEA)-based drivers to the United States without implementing legally required safeguards.

The violations span a 27-month period beginning in July 2020, when the European Court of Justice invalidated the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework through its Schrems II ruling. During this window, Uber removed Standard Contractual Clauses—critical legal mechanisms designed to protect data in transit—from driver agreements while continuing to transfer information to U.S. servers.

The data transferred included highly sensitive information: driver account details, real-time location data, identity documents, criminal records, and medical records. The scale and sensitivity of the dataset, combined with the systematic and repetitive nature of the transfers over more than two years, prompted the DPA to issue a substantial fine while remaining below the statutory maximum penalty available under GDPR.

The investigation originated with complaints filed by drivers with the French data protection authority. The case was subsequently transferred to the Dutch DPA, which has jurisdiction because Uber maintains its European headquarters in the Netherlands. Rather than treat the transfers as isolated incidents, regulators classified them as a pattern of deliberate non-compliance following a landmark court decision that explicitly required companies to implement stronger data protection measures.

Uber has announced its intention to appeal the decision. The company's response underscores ongoing tension in tech industry operations: major platforms often rely on cross-border data flows to operate their global services, yet European regulators have increasingly demanded explicit legal justification and active safeguards for such transfers—especially following the collapse of the Privacy Shield framework.

The fine reflects broader regulatory momentum in Europe. Since the Schrems II ruling, data protection authorities have investigated numerous technology companies for similar violations. The Dutch DPA's decision against Uber signals that regulators view the removal or modification of Standard Contractual Clauses without alternative safeguards as a serious breach, particularly when sensitive data categories are involved.

For Uber drivers in Europe, the violation raises questions about how their personal information—including location history and identity documents—was handled during the 27-month period. For Uber itself, the fine represents a significant financial penalty and a legal precedent that could influence how the company structures data governance across its European operations going forward.

The decision also illustrates the distinction between regulatory fines and criminal liability in data protection cases. This enforcement action is a civil regulatory penalty issued by a data protection authority, not a criminal conviction. No individual Uber executives were personally charged or convicted in connection with these violations.

**Sources**

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/buckle-up-uber-fined-eur290m-for-7054727/

https://www.willkie.com/publications/2024/09/dutch-dpa-fines-uber-290m-for-gdpr-data-transfer-violation

https://www.willkie.com/publications/2024/11/dutch-data-protection-authority-fines-uber-290-million-for-gdpr-data-transfer-violation

Related Content
A compromised Microsoft Exchange server displays a terminal screen filled with cryptic code, cables snaking out as a technician in the background examines the setup, symbolizing the widespread impact of the 2021 Hafnium cyberattack.

Chinese State Hackers Breached Thousands via Microsoft Exchange

A computer screen displays the Robinhood logo alongside an alert notification icon, symbolizing the massive user data breach and subsequent cybersecurity scandal.

7 Million Robinhood Users Hit in November 2021 Data Breach

A laptop screen displaying lines of code and visible API tokens, surrounded by notes and diagrams illustrating a data scraping scheme related to LinkedIn profiles, in a cluttered tech workspace.

700 Million LinkedIn Users' Data Sold on Dark Web Forum

A Starwood-branded server room with tangled Ethernet cables and a laptop displaying a web shell interface, symbolizing the vulnerability exploited in Marriott's data breach affecting 500 million guests

Marriott's Massive Breach: 383 Million Guests Exposed

Advertisement
SS

Susanne Sperling

Se alle artikler →
Del dette opslag: