Police subjected four of the five to interrogations lasting 14 to 30 hours. Despite no physical evidence linking them to Meili's attack, four eventually gave confessions—all of which they would later claim were coerced. The confessions were deeply problematic: they contradicted each other in key details and did not match the crime scene evidence. Critically, semen DNA recovered from Meili matched none of the five accused.
A sixth teenager, Steven Lopez, was also indicted but his charges were dropped after he pleaded guilty to a separate assault on another jogger, John Loughlin.
**The Trial and Convictions**
The case went to trial in 1990. After 10 days of deliberation, a jury convicted all five on August 18, 1990—not of attempted murder (three were acquitted on that count) but of rape, assault, robbery, and riot. McCray, Richardson, and Salaam each received sentences ranging from 5 to 7 years. Santana was sentenced to 5 years, and Wise to 5 to 15 years in prison. In total, the five served between 6 and 13 years in custody.
The convictions rested almost entirely on the contested confessions. The lack of DNA evidence, the absence of physical linking evidence, and the inconsistencies between the confessions were overlooked or minimized.
**The Exoneration**
In 2002, serial rapist Matias Reyes confessed to the sole attack on Meili. DNA testing confirmed he was the perpetrator. Reyes had a history of violence in Central Park: he had attacked and attempted to rape another woman just two days before Meili's assault on April 17, 1989. He went on to commit additional rapes and murders in subsequent years.
The Central Park Five were exonerated. In 2014, they settled a wrongful conviction lawsuit against New York City for $41 million—one of the largest settlements of its kind.
**A Systemic Failure**
The case stands as a stark reminder of how investigative tunnel vision, aggressive interrogation of minors, and over-reliance on confession evidence can destroy innocent lives. The teenagers' youth made them particularly vulnerable to coercion during lengthy interrogations without adequate legal representation. The failure to properly investigate alternative suspects or account for DNA exclusionary evidence compounded the tragedy.
The Central Park Five case has since become a landmark example in discussions of criminal justice reform, false confessions, and racial bias in policing and prosecution.
**Sources**
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case
https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/case-study/the-central-park-five
https://courts.ca.gov/sites/default/files/courts/default/2024-12/btb25-1f-00ppt.pdf
https://innocenceproject.org/news/central-park-five-tragedy-reframed-in-netflix-series-when-they-see-us-2/
https://www.hawaiiinnocenceproject.org/false-confessions
